Adams v. Nathan Trimble (2023, 8th Cir.) Excessive Force Claim/Verbal Warnings - K9 Use of Force Case Review

Facts

  • Plaintiffs: TonyaMarie Adams, on behalf of her son A.H. (a 13-year-old) sued Officer Nathan Trimble under § 1983, alleging excessive force by failing to give a warning when using a K-9 that could bite and hold.  

  • Date: August 11-12, 2020, Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Police responded to a burglary at a convenience store, followed by a fleeing vehicle; several suspects then pursued a fleeing individual on foot.  

  • Investigation and warnings:

    • Canine units, including Officer Trimble and dog “Ace,” were involved in searching for suspects.  

    • Cedar Rapids Police Department policy requires that handlers give verbal warnings before releasing a dog or searching an enclosure with a dog, notifying suspects that the dog will bite unless the suspect surrenders.  

    • Other officers (not Trimble) gave several loud, public warnings over the PA system, at multiple locations in the search area, directing suspects to surrender or risk being bitten.  

  • What happened with A.H.:

    • A.H. was hiding under a trailer in a backyard. The dog Ace, alerted to “fresh human odor,” located A.H. and bit him on his upper arm.  

    • A.H. alleges he did not hear the warnings given by other officers.  

    • The dog held him (bit him) for about 20 seconds before Trimble gave the release command. A.H. was transported to the hospital, treated, and released.  

CODE 4 K9 - USE OF FORCE REVIEW/ANALYSIS - EXPERT TESTIMONY/WITNESS - SWAT/K9 INTEGRATION/TRAINING

Previous
Previous

Bewley v. Town of Speedway, et al., Court of Appeals of Indiana (Oct. 30, 2023) - K9 Use of Force Case Review

Next
Next

Salazar v. Unknown Police Dog Handler (K-9), No. 5:23-CV-00054 (N.D. Tex.) Excessive Force Claim - K9 Use of Force Case Review